Skip to main content
Mobility product leaders

In conversation with Daniel

In the era of AI, people expect relocation to be as instant as booking the trip.

📍 filmed in seattle

Daniel Dufficy, DoorDash Global Mobility, Gullie Mobility Product Community

“Moving is one of the top three most stressful things anyone does in their life.”

Daniel Dufficy, DoorDash

About

Daniel runs global mobility at DoorDash. He got into the industry in 2013 the way a lot of the best people do, by accident: a recruiter pitched him a job that sounded like being a travel agent, and it turned out to be a relocation management company. A year and a half later, Walt Disney hired him onto the Shanghai Disneyland Resort project, his first taste of the corporate side and the moment mobility became a career instead of a paycheck.

Before any of that, he lived the job. Born in Denver and moved twice as a kid before landing in Southern California, he studied film at UC Berkeley, graduated into the Great Recession, volunteered at Burmese refugee camps in western Thailand, taught English in Seoul, and took a master's in public policy at City University of Hong Kong on the way to a diplomat's career that never happened. These days his husky makes him more friends at the park than he can keep up with.

Based in
Bellevue, Washington
Hometown
Born in Denver, Colorado; raised in Southern California
Favorite city
San Francisco
If not mobility
Writing screenplays
Hobbies
Walking his husky, who is better at meeting people than he is

Video interview coming soon

Daniel Dufficy has been the new kid. Born in Denver, moved to Phoenix, then dropped into a Southern California fourth-grade classroom in the winter of 1996, mid-year, mid-project, while every other kid was building elaborate dioramas of the Spanish missions. “I had no idea what those even were. I just felt like a fish out of water.”

He settled in, became “a proper Southern Californian,” and kept moving anyway: UC Berkeley for film, a volunteer stint teaching English at Burmese refugee camps in western Thailand after graduating into the Great Recession, then Seoul in 2011, “before K-pop and K-dramas were really big globally,” which he calls “one of the biggest culture shock and homesickness experiences I ever went through.” A master's in public policy at City University of Hong Kong came next, because “I just felt like Hong Kong was the future. I said, I have to go live there.”

The plan was to become a diplomat. Instead: “Without knowing where I'd end up, those experiences as a kid moving around connect to where I am in my career now.”

01

The job that sounded like a travel agent

Mobility found him, not the other way around. Broke and back in the US after Hong Kong, he took a recruiter's pitch for what “sounded a lot like being a travel agent.” It was a relocation management company. “I didn't realize at all what I had stepped into.”

What kept him was the shape of the work. “It was always a new problem. You were working with people from all over the world.” And having just lived the hard version himself, he could do the part no script covers: “I could really sell people on the idea of taking an opportunity to go live in Shanghai.”

A year and a half in, Walt Disney hired him onto the Shanghai Disneyland Resort project. “That's where I got my first taste of the corporate side, and that's when I felt like, hey, this is a career I can buy into long term.”

02

A suite of tools, not a pink slip

Ask Daniel where AI takes the industry and he starts with honesty about the pace. “That's one of those industries that can change every two weeks. You think you have it figured out, and then some company you haven't heard of yet releases something that changes the game.”

But he's not buying the doom. “The fears about it are played into a bit too much by people who stand to gain from people being afraid of it. I don't think it's going to come and take everybody's job. Ten years from now, I think it's going to be seen in a very similar way to the release of Microsoft Office: a suite of tools that changed the way that people work.”

The exception is real, and he names it plainly. “If your job was creating spreadsheets or presentations or consolidating raw data, your job could be at risk. If you're in that sort of job, you want to grow your knowledge base very quickly.”

03

The Airbnb expectation

The bigger shift AI has already made is to expectations. “People can build out a presentation deck in five minutes where it used to take hours. So they come to you and say, I need movers booked and housing booked, I'm going to be out there in two weeks, do you think you can get back to me this afternoon? Like, no. No, I can't.”

The comparison every employee now carries in their head is consumer travel. “If you want to book an Airbnb or a hotel, you can do that instantaneously. So they come to you thinking that's the experience you can actually have when you relocate. And it's like, no. Not really. Not in the old framework, where your RMC has to send an initiation email, all these different sub-suppliers have to review it and respond with their options, and that comes back to you. That takes multiple business days.”

His question for the industry: “Why can't you source things like temporary housing instantly?” His answer for why companies haven't just handed everyone an Airbnb login: “You trade quality control for time.” Give a 24-year-old cash and “they're probably going to crash on a friend's couch anyway.” But “if you have a young family and you give them money, and they work with a mover who's a scammer who refuses to deliver until you pay an increased cost, people in a much more vulnerable situation take a big hit. There's a duty of care element to it. You're asking the person to make that life decision, and if that happens to them, they'll come to you.”

04

Money is not a policy

So when should a startup start taking mobility seriously? “When you have to start recruiting talent outside of where you're based.” And more precisely, when the workforce matures. “If you're hiring a bunch of young people out of college, money is not really a bad option. When you're younger, that's all you really need. But when you start hiring more experienced professionals, people with families, you can't just throw money at them. They may say yes, but if it's a bad experience for the family, they're bitter about it, and they're going to be looking to leap somewhere else.”

That's also his case for why policy exists at all. “You need a policy so you get away from just dumping money on people without any guardrails. If you don't have guardrails, people come to you with a bunch of exceptions, and it's sure, why not, sure, why not. You start risking people having inequitable experiences: someone who caught you at the right time gets really special treatment, and someone who deserves the same consideration caught you at the wrong time. You need a framework that's repeatable and scalable, and able to contain your costs.”

05

The mistake that costs millions

There's one early-stage mistake Daniel flags above all the others, because it hides for years before it detonates: sending someone on an international assignment while they hold incentive stock options. “You can send someone on an assignment where their ISOs require you to pay millions of dollars in taxes in the place you put them, for five, six years. And that was never part of what you were planning.”

The trap springs at the best possible moment. “If you go public and the person executes while they're on assignment, you're going to get absolutely burned. It's a mistake that happens in the early days without a proper mobility manager, because if you have a random HR admin doing it, they're not thinking about tax when you go public.”

06

Why he's betting on Gullie

Daniel gives startups his time deliberately. “The space has all these companies that have been around for a long time, that had a stranglehold on everything for a while. If you just talk to them, the way they do things is the best way to do it, and there's no other way. So for me it's always really interesting to see what else is on the horizon. There could be something that's really cool, something that has a chance to shape the future of it.”

What he saw in Gullie was a generational fit. “Gen Z doesn't want to do things the way traditional RMCs do. They don't want to spend an hour on the phone. They want to message, get really quick responses, self-manage. What you're offering is a platform they actually enjoy using. What I saw was, this is something that's going to work for the workforce that's coming.”

He's clear-eyed that it started small, “solving a very specific need for a specific group of people,” and just as clear about the trajectory. “What you're doing has the opportunity, five, ten years from now, to be a big player in the space, because you are focusing on the workforce of the future.”

More from the conversation

Question 01

Why mobility?

It wasn't an intentional thing. I didn't know what mobility was. After Hong Kong, I came back to the US without any money, and I needed a job. Because of my background living abroad, a recruiter messaged me about an opportunity with a company that, to me, sounded a lot like being a travel agent. I said sure, I'll try that out. I didn't realize at all what I had stepped into. Over time, I just fell in love with it. It was always a new problem. You were working with people from all over the world. And because I was really passionate about my own experiences abroad, fresh from Korea and Hong Kong, I could really sell people on the idea of taking an opportunity to go live in Shanghai. A year and a half in, I got a job offer from Walt Disney to work on their Shanghai Disneyland Resort project. That's where I got my first taste of the corporate side, and that's when I felt like, hey, this is a career I can buy into long term.

Question 02

You studied film at Berkeley and say you were always a good writer. If mobility hadn't happened, what would you be doing?

If I got what I wanted when I was younger, I would be a writer. I've always been a good writer. Screenplays, story building, I always really enjoyed that part. Never good at actually finishing a story, that was my problem. And that's actually one of the things I worry about with AI: because you can lean on it to write so much, will it take away my writing skill if I use it too often? Because I won't be sharpening that tool.

Question 03

You said it flatly: no, RMCs and their clients are not aligned. Walk us through why.

People want to make money, right? That's what they're there to do. They're there to keep you as a customer, but the way they make money is through revenue sharing, referral fees, real estate. So a lot of what they advise you to do are ways for them to make money. Which is fine, you need them to survive to have that centralized model, and the benefit of outsourcing is that you don't need to hire a team of ten or fifteen operators. But you have to understand that's their primary motivator. They'll do enough to keep you as a client, but they're not going to lean in completely to achieve all the goals that you want. Their focus is maximizing revenue and yours is reducing cost while maintaining employee experience. You're not always fully aligned, because you're not really working toward the same goal.

Question 04

You also said that if you're not the biggest program on the block, you'll never be an A-tier client. What does that actually look like?

If you're not a program with real estate as a core feature or one of the giant names, you're not a program RMCs are truly ever going to make an A-tier client. What they want from you mostly is to have your logo on a sales deck. They're probably not going to make a lot of money off you, but they want to be able to say that you're their client. And that means they're going to do just enough to be able to keep saying that. You get a C-level team servicing your account. Where tech can help is that you're no longer hemmed in by the level of talent you've been given.

Question 05

A hiring manager tells you a move is critical. How do you know whether to believe them?

Not every decision maker is working toward the same goals. One trap you can get into is that the person you're talking to tells you this thing is really important, but they have their own aims. Then you go to the VP, and the VP says, we actually don't care that much about that. So if you're a mobility manager, especially if you're new to it, you've got to make sure the buck is stopping with the right individual. That's why I work most closely with HR business partners, budget owners, and the people who own the P&L: the actual business decision makers.

Question 06

Cost, experience, or speed: what's the most important thing a mobility manager is optimizing for?

The answer to that is just yes. Everything. You always want to find a way to make sure you're spending company investment most efficiently. You want employees to be happy with their experience, because you want them to go through the program and think, wow, that was great, I'm bought in. Moving is one of the top three most stressful things anyone does in their life, and a job is not the most important thing in life to begin with. If you do something that big for the benefit of a job and it goes poorly, you're probably thinking, I want another job, and maybe to get back home. And then speed, which is probably the biggest challenge now, because in the era of AI, people's expectations of how fast things can be done have completely changed.

Question 07

Out of every city you've lived in, Denver to Seoul to Hong Kong, which is your favorite?

San Francisco. I've always enjoyed it. But I'll say this too: you've got to take what people in San Francisco say about LA with a grain of salt, because there's a rivalry. There's good stuff in LA, you've just got to dig it out. There's a lot of talent in Southern California. I'm going to plant my Southern California flag right there.